Kath Pinnock

Liberal Democrat Councillor for Cleckheaton Ward and member of the House of Lords. Learn more

Lib Dems oppose unfair Free schools

by Kath Pinnock on 9 October, 2010

The Lib Dems debated the Conservative policy of so-called free schools and academies at their national conference in September.

Over 1,000 Lib Dems attended the well-argued debate. I was able to make a speech. I described the grave concerns that local residents had with the proposal for a so-called Free school in Birkenshaw. The proposal was already proving divisive; the application for the school showed that they intended to exclude children from Birstall; and it would damage the viability of Whitcliffe Mount school.

The policy to oppose Free schools was overwhelmingly supported by the Lib Dem Conference and is now our Party policy.

The text of the policy is:

Conference re-asserts its commitment to the key principles agreed at the spring 2009 conference in Harrogate in policy paper 89, Equity and Excellence, and specifically that:
i) Local Authorities should retain strategic oversight of the provision of  school places funded by the use of public money.
ii) Local Authorities should continue to exercise their arms-length support for all state schools funded wholly or partially with public funds with particular emphasis on their work with disadvantaged pupils.

Conference calls on government to ensure that schools remaining within the Local Authority family are not financially penalised by the creation of  academies and specifically:
a) That academies should be required to pay the full cost including administrative overheads for any services they buy back from the Local Authority.
b) That academies should have only observer status on the Schools Forum as they have placed themselves outside the democratic system for the funding of education.

In relation to ‘free schools’, conference calls on all Liberal Democrats to urge people not to take up this option because it risks:
1. Creating surplus places which is prejudicial to the efficient use of resources in an age of austerity.
2. Increasing social divisiveness and inequity into a system which is already unfair because of the multiple tiers and types of schools created by successive Conservative and Labour governments and thus abandoning our key goal of a high quality education system for all learners.
3. Depressing educational outcomes for pupils in general.
4. Increasing the existing complexity of school admissions and exclusions.
5. Putting at risk advances made in making appropriate provision for children with special needs.
6. Putting in jeopardy the programme of improving school buildings.
7. Wasting precious resources, both human and material, at a time when all efforts should be focused on improving educational outcomes by enabling effective teaching and learning to take place in good local schools accessible to all.

   1 Comment

One Response

  1. Jane Eades says:

    The Lib Dems at conference are to be congratulated for voting so overwhelmingly in support of the above motion. However, they have been let down by the Lib Dems in Parliament who allowed the Academies Act to be pushed through so quickly in the summer.

    The Act sidelines local authorities and prevents them from making any sensible plans for education in their areas. Consultation for schools planning to covert to academy status is limited to those the governors see fit to consult and the Secretary of State decides if the consultation is sufficient – not even a requirement to consult the local authority!

    Shame on the Lib Dem MPs who voted to put even more power in the hands of the Secretary of State and a very few unelected individuals in local areas who want private education at our expense.

    The Department for Education was asked in July for a list of groups which had applied to set up “free” schools. So far they have refused to disclose this information. They have also not released the Funding Agreements for those schools which converted to academies in September. Why the secrecy???

Leave a Reply

You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>